This landmark case was the first of its kind seeking to overturn Pennsylvania law to ensure equal right to education for all children, including appropriate education for children with intellectual disability, then called mental retardation (The Public Interest Law Center, n.d.). Paraphrase in 2-3 sentences a description of each party’s stance for each of the three selected cases. Restate in your own words, a 2–3 sentence summary of the final court ruling for each of the three selected cases. Explain in 2-3 sentences, using your own words, how the historical legal rulings you selected have supported the needs of students with disabilities. Embed into your timeline a relevant link to a website or video that describes each selected case in user-friendly terms.
Identify the legislative act by name and date. Paraphrase in one to two sentences a description of the legislative act. Explain in one to two sentences, using your own words, how the legislative act has supported the needs of students with disabilities. Be sure to include a link and in-text citations.
This case interpreted the Education for All Handicapped Children Act, now evolved into the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), to include reimbursement for private school placement if a school district does not provide a free and appropriate IEP for a student (Wrightslaw, 2010). Paraphrase in 2-3 sentences a description of each party’s stance for each of the three selected cases. Restate in your own words, a 2–3 sentence summary of the final court ruling for each of the three selected cases. Explain in 2-3 sentences, using your own words, how the historical legal rulings you selected have supported the needs of students with disabilities. Embed into your timeline a relevant link to a website or video that describes each selected case in user-friendly terms.
Identify the legislative act by name and date. Paraphrase in one to two sentences a description of the legislative act. Explain in one to two sentences, using your own words, how the legislative act has supported the needs of students with disabilities. Be sure to include a link and in-text citations. story info here
This case interpreted the appropriate placement for students with disabilities by examining factors used to determine the least restrictive environment: "(1) the educational benefits available in the regular classroom; (2) the non-academic benefits of interaction between a student with disabilities and those without disabilities; (3) the impact of the student with disabilities on the teacher and other children in the regular classroom; and (4) the cost of supplementary aids and services required for mainstreaming the student" (Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund, 1994). Paraphrase in 2-3 sentences a description of each party’s stance for each of the three selected cases. Restate in your own words, a 2–3 sentence summary of the final court ruling for each of the three selected cases. Explain in 2-3 sentences, using your own words, how the historical legal rulings you selected have supported the needs of students with disabilities. Embed into your timeline a relevant link to a website or video that describes each selected case in user-friendly terms.
We'd love to hear from you. Please send questions or feedback to the below email addresses.
Before contacting us, you may wish to visit our FAQs page which has lots of useful info on Tiki-Toki.
We can be contacted by email at: hello@tiki-toki.com.
You can also follow us on twitter at twitter.com/tiki_toki.
If you are having any problems with Tiki-Toki, please contact us as at: help@tiki-toki.com
Close