Max Valentin (Curator, FABEL) - "In this exhibition of ballot papers spanning more than 100 years with a focus on five countries, we can see how ballots mirror and change with historical context, societal demands, and geopolitical influences: the influence and spread of the party focussed French ballot system in the earlier part of the 20th century, and the rise in popularity of the single, government-issued, Australian ballot over time."
Therese Pearce-Laanela (Senior Programme Manager, International IDEA) - "The design of a ballot paper is important to election administrators as a key tool to understand the voter’s intentions and political choices: a good design presents clear and understandable options to voter and reduces the chances of voter error. But beyond this utilitarian function, the ballot carries a powerful symbolic value of the compact between the citizen and the state, or, more simply put: ‘my vote matters’. This exhibition presents a range of ballots that illustrate these design choices and historical significance – from the 2000 Florida Gore – Bush ‘hanging chad’ ballot, to the South African 1994 first post-apartheid ballot."
This timeline has been made available through close cooperation between Studio Kalleinen (FI), IESC (LT), Folkevirket (DK), Fabel (SE) and International IDEA with financial support by Nordic Culture Fund
Australia's addition to the 'Secret Ballot"
View on timelineNational parliament, Turnout: 40%, Write in ballot, Indirect system.
View on timelineNational parliament (Second chamber), Turnout: 42%, Write in ballot, Mixed system
View on timelineNational parliament, Turnout: 71 %, Single ballot (Australian ballot) (sample), Open list proportional system
View on timelineNational parliament, Turnout: 60 %, Single ballot (Australian ballot), Open list proportional system
View on timelineNational assembly, turnout: 58%, proportional representation
View on timelineCongressional and Gubernatorial elections, turnout: 40%
View on timelineNational parliament, Turnout: 67 %, Single ballot (Australian ballot), Open list proportional system
View on timelineNational parliament, Turnout approx. 75 %, Single ballot (Australian ballot), List proportional representation
View on timelineNational parliament, Turnout: 90 %, Multi-ballot (French ballot), List proportional representation
View on timelineNational parliament, Turnout: 54%, Multi-ballot (French ballot), List proportional representation
View on timelineNational parliament, Turnout: 86 %, Multi-ballot (French ballot), List proportional representation
View on timelineNational parliament, Turnout: 89 %, Single ballot (Australian ballot), List proportional representation
View on timelineNational parliament, Turnout: 95 %, Unity ballot, Indirect (non-democratic)
View on timelineNational parliament, Turnout: 68 %, Single -ballot (Australian ballot) hybrid, Nominal list of candidates
View on timelineNational parliament Turnout: 75 % Write in ballot (left), Single ballot, (Australian ballot) (right), Open list proportional system
View on timelineParliament, Turnout: 86 %, Single ballot (Australian ballot), List proportional representation
View on timelineNational parliament, Turnout: approximately 99%, Ballot cards Writie-in ballot, Non-democratic
View on timelineNational parliament, Turnout: 95 %, Single ballot, Non-democratic
View on timelineNational parliament Turnout: 79 %, Single ballot (Australian ballot), Mixed-member proportional representation
View on timelineNational parliament, Turnout: 75 %, Write in ballot, Open list proportional representation
View on timelineLower House (Folketinget), 80 %, Single ballot (Australian ballot), List proportional representation
View on timelineNational parliament, turnout: 80 %, Write in ballot, List proportional representation
View on timelineMunicipal, Turnout: 87%, Multi-ballot (French ballot), List proportional representation
View on timelineNational parliament, Turnout: 82 %, Single ballot (Australian ballot), List proportional representation
View on timelineNational parliament, 88%, Multi-ballot (French ballot), List proportional representation
View on timelineParliament, 89 %, Single ballot (Australian ballot), List proportional representation
View on timelineNational Parliament, turnout: 75.47%, single ballot, preferential voting
View on timelineNational parliament, Turnout: 93 %, Single ballot (Australian), List proportional representation
View on timelineNational parliament, Turnout: 72 %, Multi-ballot (French ballot), Two-round system
View on timelineNational parliament. Turnout: 78 %. Single ballot (Dual vote). Mixed-member proportional representation
View on timelineParliament, Turnout: 90 %, Single ballot (Australian ballot), List proportional representation
View on timelineNational Parliament, Turnout: 87 %, Single ballot (Australian ballot), List proportional representation
View on timelineNational parliament, Turnout: 53 %, Single-ballot (Australian ballot), Open list proportional
View on timelineWe'd love to hear from you. Please send questions or feedback to the below email addresses.
Before contacting us, you may wish to visit our FAQs page which has lots of useful info on Tiki-Toki.
We can be contacted by email at: hello@tiki-toki.com.
You can also follow us on twitter at twitter.com/tiki_toki.
If you are having any problems with Tiki-Toki, please contact us as at: help@tiki-toki.com
CloseCountries' Political History Through the Design of Ballot Papers.
Max Valentin (Curator, FABEL) - "In this exhibition of ballot papers spanning more than 100 years with a focus on five countries, we can see how ballots mirror and change with historical context, societal demands, and geopolitical influences: the influence and spread of the party focussed French ballot system in the earlier part of the 20th century, and the rise in popularity of the single, government-issued, Australian ballot over time."
Therese Pearce-Laanela (Senior Programme Manager, International IDEA) - "The design of a ballot paper is important to election administrators as a key tool to understand the voter’s intentions and political choices: a good design presents clear and understandable options to voter and reduces the chances of voter error. But beyond this utilitarian function, the ballot carries a powerful symbolic value of the compact between the citizen and the state, or, more simply put: ‘my vote matters’. This exhibition presents a range of ballots that illustrate these design choices and historical significance – from the 2000 Florida Gore – Bush ‘hanging chad’ ballot, to the South African 1994 first post-apartheid ballot."
This timeline has been made available through close cooperation between Studio Kalleinen (FI), IESC (LT), Folkevirket (DK), Fabel (SE) and International IDEA with financial support by Nordic Culture Fund